AAFC Chairman Nick Galatas: “Your next expansion club should be from the division below”

South Melbourne FC

The prospect of a National Second Division below the A-League Men has captivated the day-to-day speculation and debate of Australian football’s dedicated adherents for some time now.

For the Association of Australian Football Clubs (AAFC) – the body which represents the collective of National Premier League clubs looking to initiate the National Second Division – it is about transforming the aforementioned hypothesising and conversation into a tangible reality.

Realistically, the implementation of a National Second Division has taken its time for myriad of reasons, namely due to having to balance multiple stakeholders, needing to meet Football Australia’s (FA) requirements during their transition from Football Federation Australia, and recovering from the collateral damage caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

In a conversation with Soccerscene, AAFC Chairman Nick Galatas discusses how the National Second Division is shaping up ahead of the organisation’s 2024 deadline (which has been confirmed by FA CEO James Johnson via ESPN) and what the next steps are for the clubs involved.

AAFC Galatas

What was the outcome of the AAFC’s meeting in late October regarding the prospective National Second Division?

Nick Galatas: We convened that meeting at the conclusion of FA’s presentations to the clubs about the work FA have done on the National Second Division. The FA met with the various clubs and sought feedback from the clubs on a state-based format. After attending those meetings, we thought it would be helpful to convene all the interested clubs from around Australia – after they’d had time to consider what FA put to them and the issues about which FA sought their feedback.

We met in Sydney, and together the clubs considered the important issues about which FA sought their input and feedback and reached consensus on those areas. We’ve given that feedback to FA to inform FA’s further work in completing the structure of the NSD.

Undoubtedly the establishment of a National Second Division is going to require a lot of impetus and momentum alongside the knowledge and experience of various industry experts. What areas of expertise are the NSD’s organisers looking to utilise in order to drive the league forward effectively?

Nick Galatas: Impetus and momentum are key. That’s both from our perspective in keeping FA and the public onto it, and also our clubs in reminding them of what’s coming so that they keep getting ready and maintain that momentum.

To preface your question on industry experience and expertise, just to break this up a little bit, this will be a FA run competition – that’s what’s proposed. Football Australia will be the administrator as they were when the A-League started and the clubs understand and agree with that. FA will look to commercialise it, implement strategies, and engage various experts.

Having said that, at the same time the clubs as a group operating through us are also working with some experts in order to inform club thinking individually and collectively, which in turn we hope to inform FA with. The clubs are individually and collectively working on revenue-raising, how to best capitalise themselves for the increased expenditure that will come with a National Second Division, and how to cooperate within that national environment to grow the competition and their clubs.

As well as that, some market research and surveying – a lot of these clubs have now been operating within a much smaller market within the NPL for a long time, and they currently connect with their larger latent supporter base only on special events. For example, having a deep run into the Australia Cup tournament – as we’ve seen recently – and lots of their supporters who long to see their clubs on the national stage playing bigger matches emerge but they’re not necessarily in contact with these clubs on a regular basis while they’re NPL clubs, restricted in what they can do.

Assisting the clubs to understand what their supporter base is likely to look like now for some of the existing clubs who were previously playing at national level 20 years later is important. So, work has been done there, as well as about the available broadcast options.

As stated by the AAFC following that meeting, the 30 clubs collectively welcomed FA’s proposal to “proceed with a financially viable national ‘Home and Away’-style second division competition which will sit between the NPLs and the A-Leagues which largely mirrors AAFC’s model”. How close are we to having this now implemented?

Nick Galatas: Again, this comes back to FA, but we’ve said in our press release now that 2024 is our goal. FA had said 2023 – that’s obviously unfeasible and can’t now happen, but we think it will happen in 2024 and it must. The understanding that we have is that FA will complete its modelling and put out an expression of interest in the first quarter of next year, by around the end of March.

Interested clubs will all basically be with a deep history and involvement in football, grassroots and otherwise – that’s part of FA’s model. Clubs will apply through an expression of interest. After that, with a view to that process taking place over a two-three month period, so that FA can select the teams and announce the participants of the second division for ’24 in ’23. It will be a fantastic impetus to our game, helping with its unification and growth, following the Women’s World Cup here and New Zealand and the Matildas playing in another World Cup, by starting in 2024.

AAFC Meeting

How is the NSD looking to engage sponsors and investment into the league?

Nick Galatas: No doubt this question is predicated on what’s been done by the entities in the A-Leagues. For the National Second Division, many of its clubs will already have a presence – whether they be clubs in their current form or clubs in combination with others – and will have a tradition and reputation to draw on from the start. Therefore, that will become apparent when the clubs are known and they’ll have those reputations and traditions both individually and collectively, so, there’ll be a multiplying effect.

You’ll be able to tap into the past and you’ll be able to look at matches that go back 20, 30 years and that’s one element. Other elements are there could be clubs that are rising in particular regions – such as growth areas in Brisbane and other cities – which will have a very strong local flavour. These clubs, with their current reputations given that they exist already, will be able to leverage that reputation, history, knowledge, and tradition in attracting sponsors.

When the historic clubs overseas were proposing the European Super League, one of the British members of Parliament referred to the English clubs as “cherished cultural institutions”. And that’s what we’ve got here. Now, I think what we haven’t appreciated properly yet – in our rush for our game to become major in this country – is that a lot of clubs that were formed by various communities have so much to offer on our quest for growth and we shouldn’t lose that. It’s irreplaceable.

From the oldest club established in Newcastle over 100 years ago, to some now being 60, 70 or 80 years old, to some being a bit newer, I think we’ll eventually come to realise that we’ve got in this country. Organisations that have been formed by members of various communities and they have grown and evolved and continue to do so – which really, we should be cherishing. Instead of doing what we did 20 years ago and that is to bury them effectively, we should be cherishing them, understanding their cultural significance and with successful, major sports being embedded in our culture, that such clubs are key to game’s growth here.

We’ve come a long way recently, but for example, while we’ve still got a long way to go with our First Nations recognition, understanding that they are a major part of our society in every sense, that’s one area of our community. What I think will happen is – as we deal with that – the next part will be to go back again and look at the great immigration waves in Australia and realise their importance too, in their own way. They played key roles in the development and enrichment of our communities, people and social structures. Football, and our football and community, are interwoven in that way. And I think that understanding will also be a major sponsorship driver. Sponsors will want to associate themselves with the fantastic positives of what these grassroots cultural institutions have brought to this country.

Similarly, we’ve seen how women’s football has grown and attracted sponsors who understand the obvious central role women have in our community. I think we are poised to embrace the whole of our cultural heritage and see the migrant waves segment grow in a similar way. And as the younger generation comes through there will be a desire to appreciate whole of our history.

Is there enough fan interest for these historic clubs to properly be a part of an NSD? Will there be a benchmark of supporter numbers that clubs have to meet?

Nick Galatas: What we did at AAFC when we prepared our report for FA is we conducted a capability study among our clubs. The purpose of that was to inform FA of what we can do, because there’s no point coming up with an arbitrary set of benchmarks with parameters and criteria that we don’t have the clubs to meet. Then we won’t have a second division or anything like it.

So, the idea is not to create a second division as such, but the idea is to look at the clubs that you’ve got available and look at how to best organise it. Now, are they all the same? If not, and if you’ve got 12, 14, 16 clubs that emerge across the country as being in a position to play nationally and grow from there, a second division is created. So, what we say is, let’s look at our strongest clubs, let’s reflect what they can do individually and collectively. Obviously, they’re going to be stepping out of the NPL as the new competition will afford them better opportunities to grow from where they are and they’ll be better once there. And that will be the initial level. The level will be informed by the capability of the clubs, rather than the clubs being required to meet an arbitrary level. That’s absolutely, fundamentally key for it to be financially viable.

Some of these historic clubs have been in a state-level environment for the last 20-odd years and that’s not their natural environment nor is it for their supporters as their clubs’ DNA and background is national. So, they haven’t been there for years and what they are now is not what you’ll hopefully see when they’re back on the national stage. Start low and grow, rather than setting an arbitrary benchmark and not being able to reach it and crash.

It will be a good thing to have a National Second Division; we all agree on that. In order to ensure it works however, it needs to reflect the capability of the clubs. We think therefore it can work, and there are clubs with sufficient numbers and supporters which will be significantly in advance of what they’re delivering now in the NPL.

Oakleigh

One of the outcomes of the National Second Division is to initially provide development opportunities for players dropping down from the A-Leagues or coming up from the National Premier Leagues. How critical is it that this then develops into a second division under the A-Leagues with promotion and relegation?

Nick Galatas: Undoubtedly, that will be one of the outcomes of the second division but it is not inherently a part of it. What is inherent to it is that we need to develop more strong clubs. That’s where players play. If we try to develop players externally in independent programs separate to clubs then we’re not going to have players. Players develop at clubs. A club has supporters; it has fans; infrastructure. It nurtures players; provides money, generates sponsorship, etc. And there’s a living to be made, an economic benefit for players, at all levels.

Retention; everyone from the top internationals through to the A-League Men’s good player; the A-League Men’s workman-type player; the A-League Men’s sub; all the way down to the community guys – and I’m talking of men at the moment, but of course hopefully women down the track also – is what football is. You want retention of players; you want to occupy the sporting landscape and you want footballers playing everywhere at every level.

So, what we’re aiming for with the National Second Division is enabling more strong clubs to develop within it. Instead of sitting there wondering, as the A-Leagues is now doing, where is our next expansion going to come from, you shouldn’t have to wonder. Your next expansion club should be from among those coming through from the division below. There’s your issue. Instead of wondering ‘where’s the market’ to insert one in, it should be about allowing the best clubs to emerge where they are suited and where the local community most supports them.

Ultimately, I think the second division is very important, and I sense the FA does as well, but the issue at the moment is we need to get there. So, one of the issues that we’ve got is the division doesn’t currently exist. The minute you have promotion and relegation from the A-League Men’s, an A-Leagues club owner who has invested into the club will ask whether dropping down leads them to oblivion. A fair question if you’re a business. I would be asking it too if I was a business.

So, we need to create a National Second Division that reaches a level which ensures that if you’re getting relegated from the A-League Men’s you’re not only surviving; you’re thriving. You’re rebuilding and recharging to have another tilt when you get back there. That’s what the second division is about and it needs to ultimately align with the A-League Men’s but there’s no point talking theoretically. We need to start it and let it develop. But I think the aim always has to be – from my perspective and others will have a say in this – that the job will not be completely done if it’s not linked because we’ll have parallel national competitions and that’s not ideal.

That doesn’t mean immediate promotion and relegation, that just means an understanding of the game from all those involved, and in fairness to the A-Leagues I believe they see that these national competitions must relate to each other in a positive way, rather than compete with each other.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Why Australia is unlikely to host a Men’s World Cup in the near future

In December of last year, Saudi Arabia was officially announced as the host nation for the 2034 FIFA World Cup.

This makes them the fourth country from the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) to host the tournament—following Japan and South Korea in 2002, and more recently, Qatar in 2022.

What stood out about Saudi Arabia’s selection, though, was the lack of competition—they ended up being the only country to submit a formal bid.

Australia, a fellow AFC member nation had initially expressed interest in hosting the 2034 World Cup, but with Saudi Arabia heavily investing in their bid and momentum clearly shifting in their favor, Australia chose to step back.

Instead, they redirected their focus toward hosting the 2026 AFC Women’s Asian Cup—an event they were awarded in 2024—and the 2029 Club World Cup.

This isn’t the first time Australia has tried to bring the World Cup Down Under. Back in 2010, they launched a bid to host the 2022 tournament.

However, it ended in disappointment—they received just one vote in the first round, while Qatar controversially secured hosting rights under what many described as “suspicious circumstances.”

Now, 15 years after that failed bid, and with Saudi Arabia next in line to host, it seems increasingly unlikely that Australia will get a World Cup anytime soon. And there are several reasons why that might be the case.

Cost Factor

One of the major reasons Australia may not host a men’s FIFA World Cup in the near future is due to the enormous cost involved in staging the tournament.

According to Statista, Qatar spent a staggering $220 billion USD ($342 billion AUD) to host the 2022 World Cup, making it the most expensive edition in the tournament’s history.

This was largely due to Qatar needing to build much of the necessary infrastructure from scratch.

Even so, previous World Cups have still come with hefty price tags.

Russia spent around $11.6 billion USD ($18 billion AUD) to host the 2018 tournament, while Brazil’s 2014 World Cup cost about $15 billion USD ($23 billion AUD).

In fact, the last men’s World Cup to cost under $1 billion USD ($1.56 billion AUD) was the 1994 tournament held in the United States.

In contrast, the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup—co-hosted by Australia and New Zealand—had a far more modest price tag.

According to FIFA’s bid evaluation report, the tournament was expected to cost around $150 million AUD, with just over $100 million AUD contributed by governments.

Not only does the Women’s World Cup cost significantly less to host, but many of the stadiums and infrastructure acceptable for the women’s tournament would fall short of FIFA’s stricter requirements for the men’s event.

To meet those higher standards, Australia would need to make substantial upgrades, adding further to the cost.

Beyond the economic risks, there’s also a broader question of national priorities.

Australia may ultimately decide that the billions required to secure and host a men’s World Cup could be better invested elsewhere—into areas that deliver more lasting and equitable benefits for the population.

For example, upgrading the nation’s public health system, affordable housing initiatives, education infrastructure, and climate resilience projects are all pressing needs that demand long-term funding and attention.

Investments in regional transport networks, Indigenous community support, and renewable energy development could arguably provide a stronger return on investment in terms of social and economic outcomes.

Given these competing priorities and the immense cost of hosting, Australia may find that the pursuit of a men’s FIFA World Cup is a luxury it simply can’t justify—at least not in the foreseeable future.

Rival Interest

Rival nations within the AFC (Asian Football Confederation) would play a major role in limiting Australia’s chances of hosting a Men’s FIFA World Cup.

The FIFA World Cup is the biggest sporting event in the world, and the competition to host it is incredibly fierce.

Countries go to great lengths to secure hosting rights, especially within the AFC, where Arab nations in particular have been extremely proactive.

One major factor is the concept of sportswashing—the practice of using sports to improve a country’s global image, often as a way to divert attention from human rights issues or political controversies.

This has become especially common in the Middle East over the past decade.

Between early 2021 and mid-2023, Saudi Arabia alone reportedly spent $6.3 billion on sportswashing efforts, including around 300 sponsorship deals.

Their investments span across numerous sports: boxing, motorsport, snooker, golf, ATP tennis, cricket, and even the America’s Cup sailing regatta.

However, football has been their biggest focus.

In recent years, Saudi Arabia’s top-tier football league—the Saudi Pro League (SPL)—has emerged as Asia’s most high-profile domestic competition.

This rise in prominence has largely been driven by the league signing world-famous players to extremely lucrative contracts.

The most notable example is Cristiano Ronaldo, arguably the most recognisable athlete on the planet, who joined Al Nassr on a deal reported to be worth around $207 million USD (approximately $322 million AUD) per season.

But Saudi influence in football isn’t limited to their domestic league. They’ve also hosted major international club competitions.

For instance, five of the last six editions of the Supercopa de España—a tournament featuring the top Spanish clubs—have been held in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia’s capital.

Now it’s not just the World Cup, looking at the AFC Asian Cup, the premier men’s international football tournament in Asia, three of the last four editions were hosted by Arab nations.

Qatar alone hosted it twice during that period and Saudi Arabia is also set to host the 2027 edition.

So, Australia faces stiff competition within the AFC for the rights to host a World Cup—particularly from wealthy and politically influential Arab nations that have a proven track record of securing major football events.

The last FIFA World Cup (2022) was held in Qatar, and the next AFC host is Saudi Arabia and based on the current pattern, it wouldn’t be surprising if another Arab nation—such as the UAE—secured the next opportunity after that.

Location

One major factor that could affect Australia’s chances of hosting a men’s FIFA World Cup is its geographical location.

Because Australia is so far from Europe and the Americas—where most of the global football audience is—many matches would air at inconvenient times in those regions, potentially lowering TV viewership.

This issue was already evident during the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup, which was co-hosted by Australia and New Zealand.

According to FIFA, the final between Spain and England reached 222.02 million viewers.

That’s a noticeable drop compared to the 2019 final in France, where the USA faced the Netherlands and drew 263.62 million viewers.

A decline like this in viewership could make FIFA and its broadcasting partners think twice about holding a men’s World Cup in Australia.

Speaking of broadcasting, broadcast rights are another concern with time zone differences potentially reducing the value of international broadcast deals, since matches wouldn’t air during prime hours in key markets.

In fact, ahead of the 2023 Women’s World Cup, FIFA reportedly missed its target for selling broadcast rights by about $100 million USD ( $155 million AUD), according to the Wall Street Journal.

FIFA had hoped to bring in $300 million USD ($466 million AUD), but only managed around $200 million USD ($310 million AUD).

It even reached a point where FIFA president Gianni Infantino warned of a possible TV blackout across Europe unless broadcasters increased their offers.

All of this shows how Australia’s remote location could seriously impact global viewership and broadcasting revenue, making it a tougher sell as a host for a future men’s World Cup.

Conclusion

So, in light of these financial, geopolitical, and logistical challenges, it’s clear that the odds of Australia hosting a FIFA World Cup remain firmly stacked against them—making another failed bid not just possible, but increasingly probable.

Given the significant financial demands, complex geopolitical dynamics, and substantial logistical hurdles involved, it becomes increasingly evident that Australia faces an uphill battle in its pursuit of hosting a FIFA World Cup.

These compounding challenges not only diminish the likelihood of a successful bid in the near future, but also raise the probability that any renewed attempt could end in yet another disappointment.

Chelsea FC Women Renews Partnership with Škoda UK

Chelsea FC Women has revealed its renewal and expansion of its partnership with Škoda UK, naming the automotive brand as the club’s first-ever Official Back of Shirt Partner.

The renewed agreement will carry through the 2025/26 season and beyond, strengthening a collaboration that first took shape in January 2024. It underscores Škoda’s ongoing commitment to investing in women’s sport.

Under the new sponsorship deal, Škoda’s logo will appear prominently on the back of all Chelsea FC Women matchday kits, beginning with the closing fixtures of the 2024/25 season. The branding launch will align with Chelsea’s historic celebration of a sixth consecutive Barclays Women’s Super League title — a moment of major visibility for both the club and the brand.

Strategic Sponsorship in a Champion Setting

The timing of the extended agreement comes as Chelsea FC Women continues its commanding presence in English football — boasting eight league titles to date and eyeing a domestic treble. Škoda branding will also feature during the Adobe Women’s FA Cup Final at Wembley on 18 May, providing a high-profile platform for national exposure.

Commercial Director at Chelsea FC Women, Giulia Mazzia, highlighted the brand’s alignment with Chelsea FC Women and its broader values.

“To welcome Škoda as our first Official Back of Shirt Partner illustrates our ambition to innovate and integrate partners into our business model.

“Škoda helps us connect with fans locally and globally through both matchday presence and digital content,” she said via press release.

Beyond the Shirt: Mobility, Media and Matchday Moments

Škoda’s joint venture with Chelsea FC Women extends well beyond shirt branding, underscoring a shared commitment to innovation, performance and progress in women’s sport.

As part of the renewed deal, Chelsea Women’s players and staff — including the Women’s Academy — will be supported with vehicles from Škoda’s all-electric Enyaq range and the Kodiaq iV plug-in hybrid. This seamless integration into the team’s day-to-day operations reflects both the practical and symbolic strength of the partnership.

Škoda will also:

  • Continue as title sponsor of the “We Are Chelsea” podcast
  • Deliver exclusive digital content across Chelsea FC Women and Škoda UK channels
  • Drive a Škoda vehicle ahead of the team bus into Stamford Bridge on select matchdays — a symbolic “arrival” moment that adds visual impact and storytelling potential

Amplifying Brand Values Through Women’s Sport

Škoda has long supported women’s sport, particularly through its established ties to professional cycling — including the Tour de France Femmes and the Škoda Cycling Academy. Its growing investment in women’s football through Chelsea FC Women reflects a broader strategy centred on mobility, inclusion and elite performance.

Head of Marketing at Škoda UK, Kirsten Stagg, underscored the shared values at the heart of the collaboration.

“Chelsea Women exemplify many of the core values we hold at Škoda. It’s a privilege to partner with a team that shares our commitment to excellence and community,” she said via press release.

The brand has also welcomed five Chelsea players as official ambassadors, who will feature across digital content, grassroots and community programs, and Škoda’s internal brand initiatives.

Commercial Significance and Industry Context

Škoda’s continued investment in Chelsea FC Women reflects key trends in the evolving sports marketing landscape. With growing fan engagement, the rising value of sponsorship on women’s kits, and brands aligning with purpose-driven clubs, the partnership showcases the shift towards purpose-led collaborations.

Digital-first engagement through podcasts, player content, and matchday activations is central to long-term sponsorship success. Women’s football is quickly becoming a powerful platform for brand storytelling and global visibility.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend